Reviews Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Interested in reviews of Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution? It got 4.7 out of 5 stars from our customers. Find specific customer reviews of Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution below. We will appreciate if you also share your experiences with Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution after purchasing.
Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Currently Unavailable
Help and manuals
5
Reviews 21
Customer, Rakovník
Rated 04/06/2017, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
Well, maybe they clean it.
I guess I was expecting something more.
0 ×Report
Pavel, Praha Horní Počernice
Rated 26/01/2016, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
quality
totally unreasonable price
unrealistic conditions of use - no one will replace the solution at the recommended intervals at this price
next time I would consider buying this type of shaver under these conditions of use
0 ×Report
Jiří, Most
Rated 19/11/2015, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
cleans
smells
works
price
0 ×Report
Josef
Rated 15/09/2015, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
simplicity
Price !
0 ×Report
Adam, Bratislava - Karlova Ves
Rated 28/07/2015, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
original accessories
0 ×Report
Petr, Tišnov
Rated 14/05/2015, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
cleans
Relatively high price.
0 ×Report
Jakub, Chomutov
Rated 11/11/2013, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
after cleaning the machine, it runs like new.
0 ×Report
Josef, Praha 15
Rated 28/10/2013, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
price
0 ×Report
Lenka, Turnov
Rated 26/04/2013, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
There are no instructions for use (on the Internet it was written about dilution, but there are no instructions)
0 ×Report
Tomáš, Dobrá
Rated 20/04/2013, variant Philips HQ200/50 Jet Clean solution
Verified purchase
After half a year I decided to replace the original solution: -)
0 ×Report